Not All Template Designer Advanced Wizards Work
Thursday, October 3, 2019
Edit
An occasional weblog possessor reports frustration alongside diverse "Advanced" Template Designer wizards, inwards Blogger Help Forum: Get Help alongside an Issue.
The problem, alongside blogs that role a "Simple" template, is that the template does non incorporate the CSS rules required, to allow the wizards to create results.
Every "Advanced" sorcerer uses iii elements.
Every Template Designer "Advanced" setting sorcerer requires iii elements.
The "Simple" templates omit the necessary CSS rules.
Every template provides #1, in addition to #2. "Simple" omits #3, for diverse wizards.
At to the lowest degree iii "Advanced" wizards don't work, alongside "Simple" templates.
This paragraph of "Variable definitions" code appears to hold upward mutual to all templates.
This is 1 known employment "Advanced" sorcerer group.
The grouping requires CSS rules, which role iii variables.
For the iii wizards to work, the template needs CSS rules to use
The required CSS rules precisely are non present, inwards approximately templates.
Each of the inwards a higher house iii CSS names are acquaint solely inwards the "Variable definitions" section. In the "Simple" template, at that spot are no CSS rules to brand the variables useful.
I've seen this a dyad times. Some templates are non complete. This is a frequent annoyance, alongside approximately custom 3rd political party templates.
"Simple" is precisely that.
There are solutions.
There are several possible solutions, inwards club of reality.
Most weblog owners, reporting the problem, volition opt for #1 - though I suspect that this omission has caused approximately confusion that is non reported.
I accept entered my novel color palette nether "template>advanced>" - in addition to the colours volition non present upward on the blog.This weblog possessor wants unlike background colours, than are provided equally defaults - in addition to does non sympathize why the wizards, that advise
I fifty-fifty checked that the color values were correct nether "Edit HTML".
Template applied.simply don't work.
The problem, alongside blogs that role a "Simple" template, is that the template does non incorporate the CSS rules required, to allow the wizards to create results.
Related
Every "Advanced" sorcerer uses iii elements.
Every Template Designer "Advanced" setting sorcerer requires iii elements.
- The GUI sorcerer (below).
- The "Variable definitions" section, which defines the GUI wizards (below), in addition to the CSS variables.
- The CSS rules, that role the variables.
The "Simple" templates omit the necessary CSS rules.
At to the lowest degree iii "Advanced" wizards don't work, alongside "Simple" templates.
This paragraph of "Variable definitions" code appears to hold upward mutual to all templates.
This is 1 known employment "Advanced" sorcerer group.
<Group description="Backgrounds" selector=".body-fauxcolumns-outer"> <Variable name="body.background.color" description="Outer Background" type="color" default="#66bbdd"/> <Variable name="content.background.color" description="Main Background" type="color" default="#ffffff"/> <Variable name="header.background.color" description="Header Background" type="color" default="transparent"/> </Group>
The grouping requires CSS rules, which role iii variables.
For the iii wizards to work, the template needs CSS rules to use
- body.background.color
- content.background.color
- header.background.color
The required CSS rules precisely are non present, inwards approximately templates.
Each of the inwards a higher house iii CSS names are acquaint solely inwards the "Variable definitions" section. In the "Simple" template, at that spot are no CSS rules to brand the variables useful.
I've seen this a dyad times. Some templates are non complete. This is a frequent annoyance, alongside approximately custom 3rd political party templates.
"Simple" is precisely that.
There are solutions.
There are several possible solutions, inwards club of reality.
- Use a unlike template.
- Remove the extraneous code from the "Simple" template.
- Add the necessary CSS, to role the variables defined.
Most weblog owners, reporting the problem, volition opt for #1 - though I suspect that this omission has caused approximately confusion that is non reported.
