Content / Spam Classification Has 2 Sides
Saturday, October 5, 2019
Edit
Spend to a greater extent than or less fourth dimension surfing Blogger Help Forum: Get Help amongst an Issue - both inwards detail, for recent periods - in addition to random sampling, over long periods.
Read the comments, in addition to questions. You'll run across both complaints close spammy (aka "abusive") content - in addition to objectionable (aka "adult") content. And, you'll run across review requests, referencing previous abusive in addition to adult content penalties.
Given plenty surfing, you'll discover that each is merely the other side of the same coin.
As you lot bear witness issues discussed inwards the forum, close abusive in addition to objectionable content, hold upward objective - in addition to hold upward thorough.
Consider both sides of the classification issue.
Try to await at both sides of each story.
Each of these issues represents previous activity past times the Blogger Policy Review squad or automated content / spam review procedure - in addition to each of these issues represents to a greater extent than operate to hold upward done, past times the Blogger Policy Review squad or automated review process.
With to a greater extent than relevant reader opinion, Blogger has to hold upward to a greater extent than responsive.
As the content / spam classification procedure becomes to a greater extent than responsive to opinion, in addition to the needs of the reader population, the Blogger Policy Review squad has to dice to a greater extent than responsive to the review requests. Both the people who hold the automated classification filters - in addition to the people who behave manual reviews - know the dichotomy involved.
As the initial classification becomes to a greater extent than responsive to the needs of people who don't similar something inwards a Blogger blog, the review procedure is going to after larn more demands for review, because of unfair classification. And, to a greater extent than filter tweaks volition follow.
Both initial classification, in addition to subsequent review, dice to a greater extent than deliberate.
Both classification, in addition to review volition require to a greater extent than deliberation - because both teams know that the to a greater extent than responsive they dice inwards 1 side, the more demands they volition see, on the other.
And all of this continues, every bit cultural expansion / internationalisation, past times Blogger / Google, produces a to a greater extent than various in addition to larger spider web log content in addition to reader population. And, it every bit good produces a to a greater extent than easily offended population.
And all of this requires that the spider web log owners be willing to compromise.
Read the comments, in addition to questions. You'll run across both complaints close spammy (aka "abusive") content - in addition to objectionable (aka "adult") content. And, you'll run across review requests, referencing previous abusive in addition to adult content penalties.
Given plenty surfing, you'll discover that each is merely the other side of the same coin.
As you lot bear witness issues discussed inwards the forum, close abusive in addition to objectionable content, hold upward objective - in addition to hold upward thorough.
Consider both sides of the classification issue.
Try to await at both sides of each story.
- Look at the electrical load reports.
- Blog "xxxxxxx" is nasty. How attain I larn it blocked?
- Blog "yyyyyyy" is spammy. How attain I larn it removed?
- Then, await at the review requests.
- I give away spider web log "xxxxxxx". Why attain my readers larn an "adult" content warning?
- I give away spider web log "yyyyyyy". Why was my spider web log removed?
Each of these issues represents previous activity past times the Blogger Policy Review squad or automated content / spam review procedure - in addition to each of these issues represents to a greater extent than operate to hold upward done, past times the Blogger Policy Review squad or automated review process.
With to a greater extent than relevant reader opinion, Blogger has to hold upward to a greater extent than responsive.
As the content / spam classification procedure becomes to a greater extent than responsive to opinion, in addition to the needs of the reader population, the Blogger Policy Review squad has to dice to a greater extent than responsive to the review requests. Both the people who hold the automated classification filters - in addition to the people who behave manual reviews - know the dichotomy involved.
As the initial classification becomes to a greater extent than responsive to the needs of people who don't similar something inwards a Blogger blog, the review procedure is going to after larn more demands for review, because of unfair classification. And, to a greater extent than filter tweaks volition follow.
Both initial classification, in addition to subsequent review, dice to a greater extent than deliberate.
Both classification, in addition to review volition require to a greater extent than deliberation - because both teams know that the to a greater extent than responsive they dice inwards 1 side, the more demands they volition see, on the other.
And all of this continues, every bit cultural expansion / internationalisation, past times Blogger / Google, produces a to a greater extent than various in addition to larger spider web log content in addition to reader population. And, it every bit good produces a to a greater extent than easily offended population.
And all of this requires that the spider web log owners be willing to compromise.